Abstract / Summary
Adjuvant cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) improve outcomes in hormone receptor-positive (HR+), HER2-negative early breast cancer, though trial results have been heterogeneous. Menopausal status and endocrine therapy backbone may contribute to variability in treatment effect. We performed a meta-analysis evaluating whether menopausal status influences the efficacy of adjuvant CDK 4/6 inhibition. A systematic review of phase III randomized trials evaluating adjuvant CDK4/6i in HR+/HER2- early-stage breast cancer was conducted. Trial-level hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for iDFS and OS were extracted separately for pre-/peri-menopausal and postmenopausal subgroups. HRs were pooled using random-effects modelling (DerSimonian-Laird method) with inverse-variance modeling. Heterogeneity was assessed using I² statistics. A sensitivity analysis limited to approved CDK4/6i (ribociclib and abemaciclib) was performed. Four trials comprising 17,748 participants were included, of whom 45% were pre-/peri-menopausal and 55% were postmenopausal. Pooled iDFS HRs were 0.80 (95% CI 0.67-0.97, I²=64%) in pre-/peri-menopausal patients and 0.79 (95% CI 0.72-0.86, I²=0%) in postmenopausal patients. Pooled OS HRs were 1.02 (95% CI 0.67-1.54, I²=80%) in pre-/peri-menopausal and 0.89 (95% CI 0.78-1.03, I²=0%) in postmenopausal patients. No significant subgroup differences were observed for iDFS or OS. Compared to post-menopausal participants, those who were premenopausal had 3.0% fewer absolute iDFS events at 5-6 years. Sensitivity analyses yielded consistent findings. Efficacy of adjuvant CDK4/6 inhibition in HR+/HER2-negative early breast cancer does not appear to be influenced by menopausal status as defined in individual trials. Greater heterogeneity among pre-/peri-menopausal patients may reflect differences in endocrine therapy backbone, tumor characteristics and patient risk. Not applicable.
Topics
Primary Source
Breast cancer research and treatment
Ask Prognia AI
Have questions about this meta-analysis?
Prognia AI can search this source alongside 35M+ PubMed papers and current ESC, AHA, NICE, and ADA guidelines to give you a fully cited clinical answer.