Abstract / Summary
Heart failure (HF) is a long-term illness, frequently requiring hospital stay and having a significant morbidity and mortality rate. In order to avoid decompensation, lower readmission rates, and promote quality of life, adequate self-care is vital. This review synthesised nursing interventions intended to improve self-care among adults and older adults with HF and retrospectively interpreted their components using the Capability, Opportunity, Motivation-Behaviour (COM-B) model. A systematic search was conducted on 11 November 2025 across seven electronic databases: PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, CINAHL, Embase, MEDLINE, and PsycINFO. The review included randomised controlled studies evaluating behavioural, educational, psychological, or nursing interventions aimed at improving self-care among adults and older adults with HF. Risk of bias was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute Checklist for Randomised Controlled Trials. Database-specific search strategies and publication-year filters are reported in Additional file 1. Nine studies met the inclusion criteria. The interventions included structured education, motivational interviewing, pre-discharge education, technology-based support, and multimodal programmes. Several studies reported improvements in self-care maintenance, management, or confidence; however, the direction and magnitude of effects varied across interventions and follow-up periods. Although none of the studies explicitly used the COM-B model, their intervention components could be retrospectively mapped to Capability, Opportunity, and Motivation. Nursing interventions may improve selected dimensions of HF self-care, particularly when education is combined with follow-up, motivational support, or practical monitoring resources. However, the evidence was heterogeneous, and the magnitude and consistency of effects remain uncertain. COM-B may provide a useful framework for interpreting intervention components, but the retrospective mapping does not demonstrate that COM-B mechanisms were prospectively tested. The procedure of this study was recently filed in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) at the National Institute for Health Research (No: CRD420251237974).
Topics
Primary Source
Systematic reviews
Ask Prognia AI
Have questions about this review article?
Prognia AI can search this source alongside 35M+ PubMed papers and current ESC, AHA, NICE, and ADA guidelines to give you a fully cited clinical answer.
Related Clinical Guidelines
Related Blog Posts
ESC 2023 Heart Failure Guidelines: What Every Cardiologist Needs to Know
The 2023 focused update to the ESC Heart Failure Guidelines introduced key changes to SGLT2 inhibitor recommendations, HFmrEF management, and device therapy thresholds. Here is a practical summary.
CHADS₂-VASc in Practice: When to Start Anticoagulation in AF
A practical walkthrough of the CHADS₂-VASc scoring system, its ESC guideline thresholds, and how to use it alongside HAS-BLED to counsel patients with atrial fibrillation.