Abstract / Summary
We evaluated the effects of a 24-h istaroxime infusion on changes in self-reported dyspnea among patients with acute heart failure (AHF). Patients hospitalized for AHF with ejection fraction ≤40 were randomized to receive a 24-h infusion of placebo or istaroxime at doses of 0.5 (Ista-0.5) or 1.0 μg/kg/min (Ista-1.0). Self-reported dyspnea was assessed by means of a visual analogue scale (VAS). Dyspnea VAS area under the curve (AUC) and changes in VAS dyspnea from baseline through 24 and 48 h were compared between istaroxime- and placebo-treated patients. Among 113 AHF patients (n = 39 placebo, n = 39 Ista-0.5, n = 35 Ista-1.0), a statistically significant difference in dyspnea VAS AUC from baseline through 24 h was observed in the pooled istaroxime arm vs. the placebo arm [win odds 1.44, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.00 to 2.07; P = 0.048], with similar findings for Ista-0.5 vs. placebo (win odds 1.48, 95% CI 1.01 to 2.18; P = 0.047). Win odds consistently favored istaroxime through 48 h, though significance was not maintained. Results were numerically more pronounced among patients with baseline dyspnea VAS < 80, particularly for Ista-0.5 vs. placebo (win odds 1.71, 95% CI 0.76 to 3.83; P = 0.172). Consistent findings were observed changes in dyspnea VAS through 24 h, with a least square mean difference of 2.6 points (95% CI -1.8 to 7.0) between Ista-1.0 and placebo. Among patients with AHF, 24-h istaroxime infusion was associated with a significantly higher probability of dyspnea improvement compared with placebo through 24 h, with results being numerically more pronounced among patients with worse dyspnea at baseline.
Topics
Primary Source
Journal of cardiovascular medicine (Hagerstown, Md.)
Ask Prognia AI
Have questions about this randomised trial?
Prognia AI can search this source alongside 35M+ PubMed papers and current ESC, AHA, NICE, and ADA guidelines to give you a fully cited clinical answer.
Related Clinical Guidelines
Related Blog Posts
ESC 2023 Heart Failure Guidelines: What Every Cardiologist Needs to Know
The 2023 focused update to the ESC Heart Failure Guidelines introduced key changes to SGLT2 inhibitor recommendations, HFmrEF management, and device therapy thresholds. Here is a practical summary.
CHADS₂-VASc in Practice: When to Start Anticoagulation in AF
A practical walkthrough of the CHADS₂-VASc scoring system, its ESC guideline thresholds, and how to use it alongside HAS-BLED to counsel patients with atrial fibrillation.