Loading your page…
Loading your page…

Published by Research Excellence, Active Leadership Canadian Breast Cancer Alliance (REAL Alliance) [2]
This clinical consensus guideline, developed by the REAL Alliance, outlines national recommendations for the systemic treatment of HR+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer in Canada [2, 15]. Grounded in clinical trial data, the guideline categorizes patients by endocrine sensitivity and genomic markers (such as PIK3CA, ESR1, and BRCA1/2) to define optimal treatment selection and sequencing, including CDK4/6 inhibitors, PI3K/AKT/mTOR inhibitors, oral SERDs, PARP inhibitors, and antibody-drug conjugates, while ensuring patient preferences and quality of life are prioritized [2, 16-18].
Key Takeaways
This work represents the 2025 consensus update, with methodology consistent with previous publications by the REAL Alliance (such as Manna et al. 2024) [32, 33]. It updates guiding principles to heavily emphasize genomic testing (PIK3CA, AKT, PTEN, ESR1, BRCA1/2) and personalizing treatment sequences using newer targeted agents (CDK4/6i, PI3Ki/AKTi, SERDs, ADCs) [32, 34].
If feasible, biopsy of a recurrent lesion(s) should be considered at the time of diagnosis to evaluate biomarkers (ER/PR/HER2 status) and confirm a breast cancer diagnosis if the clinical course is not as expected. [1]
Testing for somatic pathway alterations (e.g., PIK3CA, PTEN, AKT, ESR1) and pathogenic germline variants (e.g., BRCA mutations) is standard of care when it may inform treatment decisions. Testing should be performed with appropriate methods and in a timely manner to guide treatment decisions. [2]
In the management of HR+/HER2− metastatic breast cancer, it is essential to balance disease control with quality of life, allowing patients to maintain daily activities and minimize treatment-related discomfort. [3]
The treatment and management of breast cancer in men is the same as in pre/perimenopausal women (i.e., ET + CDK4/6i +/– LHRH agonist in the first-line metastatic setting). Given the rarity of breast cancer in men, participation in clinical trials should be encouraged whenever possible. [4]
For patients with HR+/HER2− metastatic breast cancer who have not received prior or recent ET, the standard of care ET backbone in the first-line metastatic setting is an AI. [5]
For patients with de novo metastatic HR+/HER2− breast cancer, or those whose disease relapses >12 months after completing adjuvant AI, and regardless of adjuvant treatment with CDK4/6i, the standard of care first-line treatment is CDK4/6i + AI. The preferred CDK4/6i is either ribociclib or abemaciclib; however, in the case of contraindications or intolerance, palbociclib may be considered. [6]
For patients with HR+/HER2− breast cancer without a PIK3CA mutation and whose disease relapses on or ≤12 months after completion of adjuvant AI, SERD is the preferred ET backbone. [7]
For patients with HR+/HER2− breast cancer without a PIK3CA mutation and whose disease relapses on or ≤12 months after completion of adjuvant AI, and without prior adjuvant CDK4/6i, the standard of care treatment is either ribociclib + fulvestrant or abemaciclib + fulvestrant. In the case of contraindications or intolerance, palbociclib + fulvestrant may be considered. [8]
For patients with HR+/HER2− breast cancer without a PIK3CA mutation and whose disease relapses on or ≤12 months after completion of adjuvant AI, and with prior adjuvant CDK4/6i, rechallenge with ET + CDK4/6i should be considered, depending on the clinical situation and timing of relapse. [9]
For patients with HR+/HER2− breast cancer with a PIK3CA mutation and whose disease relapses on or ≤12 months after completion of adjuvant AI, inavolisib + palbociclib + fulvestrant is the standard of care. [11]
For patients with HR+/HER2− metastatic breast cancer and limited life expectancy or for those who, with shared decision-making, wish not to have intensive monitoring or toxicities, ET alone is a reasonable option. [12]
For eligible older patients (e.g., ≥75 years of age) with HR+/HER2− metastatic breast cancer, the standard of care at standard recommended doses remains the same as that for younger patients. [13]
For patients with HR+/HER2− metastatic breast cancer and visceral disease and in the absence of true visceral crisis, ribociclib + ET or abemaciclib + ET is standard of care (instead of chemotherapy) with close monitoring for progression of disease or lack of response. Palbociclib + ET may be considered if neither ribociclib nor abemaciclib are suitable. [14]
For patients with HR+/HER2− metastatic breast cancer with bone metastases, the use of bone-modifying agents (e.g., bisphosphonates or denosumab) is standard of care to reduce and delay skeletal related adverse events. [15]
For patients with HR+/HER2− metastatic breast cancer with CNS involvement, a multidisciplinary team should be involved in providing recommendations for optimal local and systemic therapies. Currently, there is insufficient evidence to recommend any given systemic therapy alone (in the absence of local therapy) for the treatment of 'active' HR+/HER2− CNS metastases. [16]
For patients with HR+/HER2− metastatic breast cancer with no targetable mutations whose disease progresses on first-line therapy of ET + CDK4/6i, switching ET + another CDK4/6i could be considered. Everolimus + ET is another consideration. [17]
For patients with HR+/HER2− metastatic breast cancer with ESR1 mutations (without PIK3CA alterations) whose disease progresses on first-line therapy of AI + CDK4/6i, a SERD is standard of care ET, either as monotherapy or in combination with a targeted agent. [18]
For patients with HR+/HER2− metastatic breast cancer whose disease progresses on first-line therapy and whose tumour has an PI3K/AKT/PTEN pathway alteration (with no prior PI3K/AKT/PTEN-directed therapy), standard of care in the second-line setting is capivasertib + fulvestrant. [Strong recommendation] Alpelisib + fulvestrant could be considered for patients with a confirmed PIK3CA mutation. [Moderate recommendation] [19]
For patients who have had two prior lines of ET (without CDK4/6i) in the metastatic setting and whose disease progresses, a trial of CDK4/6i + ET using a different ET agent should be considered. [20]
For patients with HR+/HER2− metastatic breast cancer that is ET ineligible and has progressed after prior ET + CDK4/6i in any setting, chemotherapy, including ADC, is the standard of care. [21]
(a) For patients with HR+/HER2-low or ultralow metastatic breast cancer that has progressed on prior ET + CDK4/6i, T-DXd is an option as the next line of systemic therapy if no prior chemotherapy has been given, guided by shared decision-making. [Strong recommendation] (b) For patients with HER2-low disease who have not previously received T-DXd, but who have received at least one line of chemotherapy, T-DXd is standard of care. [Strong recommendation] [23]
For patients with HR+/HER2− metastatic breast cancer with germline BRCA1/2 mutations who are no longer benefiting from ET, an oral PARP inhibitor should be considered post-ET instead of chemotherapy. [24]
For patients with HR+/HER2− metastatic breast cancer that has progressed and who have received ≥2 chemotherapy regimens and no prior ADC, sacituzumab govitecan is the standard of care. [25]
Clinical Topic
Systemic Treatment of HR+/HER2- Metastatic Breast Cancer [1]
Objectives
To provide evidence-informed guidance on best practices in the management of patients with HR+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer within the Canadian landscape, focusing on therapeutic strategies, precision oncology, and treatment sequencing while balancing efficacy with patient quality of life [2].
Target Patient Population
Patients with HR+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer [3]
Diagnostic Criteria
Tissue biopsy of recurrent lesions to confirm diagnosis and re-evaluate ER/PR/HER2 status (including HER2-low/ultralow) [23, 25]. Genomic testing for somatic alterations (PIK3CA, PTEN, AKT, ESR1) and germline BRCA1/2 mutations [26, 27].
Target Providers
Therapeutic Area
OncologyGuideline Scope
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
Special Populations
Contraindications
Monitoring Guidance
QTc interval monitoring is required at baseline, day 14 of cycle 1, and as indicated for ribociclib [28]. Baseline and routine blood glucose levels should be monitored for PI3K inhibitors like inavolisib [29]. Dental evaluations are recommended before starting bone-modifying agents to mitigate osteonecrosis of the jaw risk [30]. Proactive symptom monitoring is essential for interstitial lung disease/pneumonitis in patients receiving T-DXd [31].
Difficulty
advanced
Learning Paths