Abstract / Summary
The frequency of residual angina and its impact on health status and death following anatomic complete revascularization in symptomatic patients with chronic coronary disease are unknown. Data were analyzed from ISCHEMIA (International Study of Comparative Health Effectiveness With Medical and Invasive Approaches) trial participants randomized to invasive management with baseline angina (Seattle Angina Questionnaire Angina Frequency score <100), no prior coronary artery bypass graft surgery, and anatomic complete revascularization within 90 days of randomization. The primary outcome was frequency of residual angina after revascularization, defined as a Seattle Angina Questionnaire Angina Frequency score <100 within 6 months of randomization. Secondary outcomes included 6-month health status and medication use and 5-year all-cause and cardiovascular death. Among 2588 participants randomized to invasive management, 1442 (56%) had baseline angina and no prior coronary artery bypass graft surgery; 1034 underwent revascularization within 90 days, and 436 achieved anatomic complete revascularization. Of these, 184 (42.2%) had residual angina within 6 months. Baseline characteristics were similar between those with and without residual angina. Percutaneous coronary intervention was more common than coronary artery bypass graft surgery in those with residual angina (88% versus 80%, P=0.03). At 6 months, residual angina participants reported lower quality of life (Seattle Angina Questionnaire Quality of Life: 70±20 versus 83±20, P<0.001), greater physical limitation (Seattle Angina Questionnaire Physical Limitation: 84±20 versus 95±11, P<0.001), more dyspnea (Rose Dyspnea Scale score: 1±1.3 versus 0.4±0.8, P<0.001), and more antianginal medication use (P=0.006). Five-year all-cause and cardiovascular death did not differ significantly between groups. Residual angina is common (>40%) following anatomic complete revascularization for chronic coronary disease and is associated with reduced quality of life and greater antianginal medication use but no increase in death. Unique Identifier: NCT01471522.
Primary Source
Journal of the American Heart Association
Ask Prognia AI
Have questions about this randomised trial?
Prognia AI can search this source alongside 35M+ PubMed papers and current ESC, AHA, NICE, and ADA guidelines to give you a fully cited clinical answer.
Related Clinical Guidelines
Related Blog Posts
ESC 2023 Heart Failure Guidelines: What Every Cardiologist Needs to Know
The 2023 focused update to the ESC Heart Failure Guidelines introduced key changes to SGLT2 inhibitor recommendations, HFmrEF management, and device therapy thresholds. Here is a practical summary.
CHADS₂-VASc in Practice: When to Start Anticoagulation in AF
A practical walkthrough of the CHADS₂-VASc scoring system, its ESC guideline thresholds, and how to use it alongside HAS-BLED to counsel patients with atrial fibrillation.